Enter Email to Receive New Post Alerts:

Federalism

Definition
Founders
Brethren
References

Definition:
    Federalism: A government structure that joins two governing bodies by a covenant and allocates to each specific powers and functions. In the United States government, this covenant and division of powers exists between the federal and state governments.
    When the Founders gathered at Independence Hall in Philadelphia in 1776, their objective was not to abolish the Articles of Confederation and create a new constitution. The majority of them were concerned with the power of a national government superseding that of the states. By the end of the convention, they concluded that a national government was in the best interest of the American people, but they wanted the states to retain most of the power, leaving the federal government to play a minimal role. The tenth amendment states that "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” A correct balance of power between the national and state governments is critical to help form the foundation of a prosperous nation. In the United States, some of the powers originally left to the states at the Founding have shifted to the federal government.
    For example, under the guidance of President George W. Bush, the Congress passed the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (public law 107-110). This act mandates that state and local schools meet accountability standards established by the U.S. Department of Education. Historically, school standards have been established on the state and local level. This shift of duties from the state and local level to the federal level causes a shift in the structure of federalism. Why does it matter who mandates education standards? Advocates of state and local control of government claim that administrators and politicians in their respective areas know more about the specific needs, cultural influences, and regional factors involved in their students' education than do the various senators and representatives in Washington. Meanwhile others contend that national standards will encourage poorly performing schools to become more successful. As the federalist structure continues to evolve, the debate about which government institutions should possess which powers will continue.

The Founders:
    The Bill of Rights: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. (Tenth Amendment to the Constitution Bill of Rights, December 15, 1791)
    Alexander Hamilton: This balance between the National and State governments ought to be dwelt on with peculiar attention, as it is of the utmost importance. It forms a double security to the people. If one encroaches on their rights they will find a powerful protection in the other. Indeed, they will both be prevented from overpassing their constitutional limits by a certain rivalship, which will ever subsist between them. (Hamilton, Alexander speech to the New York Ratifying Convention, June 17, 1788)
    Thomas Jefferson: I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on this ground that 'all powers not delegated to the United States, by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states or to the people.' To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of Congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, not longer susceptible of any definition. (Jefferson, Thomas Opinion on the Constitutionality of a National Bank, February 15, 1791)

The Brethren:
    Dallin H. Oaks: (his opinion) For more than a half century our national government has been acquiring additional powers by assuming functions previously left to state and local governments. This trend has now gone so far that our national government is beginning to direct what state and local must do and even how they must spend their limited funds. This trend must be stopped and reversed or we will cease to be the federal republic established in our Constitution. It is imperative that state governments have the power and fiscal resources to respond to local needs and to capitalize on local strengths; that is the essence of federalism. But if federalism is to work, state governments must be willing to move against local and regional problems such as clean air and water and not wait for every such initiative to come from the national government. The current imbalance between national and the state governments is just as much a product of state inaction as it is of national overreaching. (Dallin H. Oaks, Provo's 1994 Freedom Festival Patriotic Service)
    Dallin H. Oaks: Another inspired fundamental of the U.S. Constitution is its federal system, which divides government powers between the nation and the various states. Unlike the inspired adaptations mentioned earlier, this division of sovereignty was unprecedented in theory or practice. In a day when it is fashionable to assume that the government has the power and means to right every wrong, we should remember that the U.S. Constitution limits the national government to the exercise of powers expressly granted to it. The Tenth Amendment provides:
    “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited to it by the States, are reserved to the States respectively or to the people.”
    This principle of limited national powers, with all residuary powers reserved to the people or to the state and local governments, which are most responsive to the people, is one of the great fundamentals of the U.S. Constitution. (Dallin H. Oaks, “The Divinely Inspired Constitution,” Ensign, Feb. 1992)
    G. Homer Durham: Federalism, the division of authority between a central government and local units, is one of the greatest political devices of all time. It limits any single all-powerful force. Caesar was not to become God, as he had in the Roman world. The device has roots in the necessities of administration, in the fact that the people in each locality can largely determine the effectiveness of governmental action for their area. For example, no federal marriage licenses are required in the United States as the basis for family organization. That precious function is retained by the states—delegated by them to the county courthouses. The principle of federalism has deep roots in man’s social needs. It finds clear expression in the Constitution of the United States. (G. Homer Durham, “The Protection of All Flesh,” New Era, Sept. 1987)
References:
Definition
Founders
Brethren
References